The amount of carbon dioxide emission per unit of electricity through nuclear power plants is equivalent to one-third compared to solar power. Nuclear power facilities emit almost no greenhouse gases, and in the last five decades, around 70 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide emissions have been avoided by using nuclear power. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has increased concerns around geographic sovereignty, with countries like Belgium and Japan declaring to prolong the lifetime of their nuclear plants.Īlthough the use of nuclear weapons in war situations is certainly an issue of concern for the world, the use of nuclear energy for the production of energy is a more refreshing concept. Nuclear energy has been in the conversation lately partly due to its ability to provide clean energy as the world transitions to zero emissions but also in part due to the rising geopolitical tensions around the world. You can skip our industry overview and go directly to the 5 Biggest Nuclear Energy and Reactor Companies in the World. State regulators will review the options the company selects, the MPCA said.In this article, we will discuss the 15 Biggest Nuclear Energy and Reactor Companies in the World. Xcel Energy is considering building above-ground storage tanks to store the contaminated water it recovers, and is considering options for the treatment, reuse, or final disposal of the collected tritium and water. “We continue to gather and treat all potentially affected water while regularly monitoring nearby groundwater sources.” “While this leak does not pose a risk to the public or the environment, we take this very seriously and are working to safely address the situation,” Chris Clark, president of Xcel Energy–Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota, said in the statement. Xcel said it has recovered about 25% of the spilled tritium so far, that recovery efforts will continue and that it will install a permanent solution this spring. Xcel reported a small tritium leak at Monticello in 2009. The NRC says tritium spills happen from time to time at nuclear plants, but that it has repeatedly determined that they’ve either remained limited to the plant property or involved such low offsite levels that they didn’t affect public health or safety. Since then, it has been pumping groundwater, storing and processing the contaminated water, which contains tritium levels below federal thresholds. 22, the same day it confirmed the leak, which came from a pipe between two buildings. The company said it notified the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the state on Nov. “Now that we have all the information about where the leak occurred, how much was released into groundwater, and that contaminated groundwater had moved beyond the original location, we are sharing this information,” he said, adding the water remains contained on Xcel’s property and poses no immediate public health risk. “We knew there was a presence of tritium in one monitoring well, however Xcel had not yet identified the source of the leak and its location,” Minnesota Pollution Control Agency spokesman Michael Rafferty said. State officials said they waited to get more information before going public with it. While Xcel reported the leak of water containing tritium to state and federal authorities in late November, the spill had not been made public before Thursday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |